Sheila Kunkle
As contributor
As commenter
-
Reading Deleuze while considering Lacan
I enjoyed your clip and commentary very much. Thank you for such an astute contribution. I hope you will forgive me now as I extend the discussion a bit into comparing Deleuze and Lacan re: the subject and remainders. As a Lacanian, I approach how both La ... -
Thank you for this great elaboration
Soumitra, Many thanks for taking the time to provide a detailed elaboration and response to my questions. This encountering of "sense" in its proper, material sensory, sensuous dimension in Lucier, as you say above is precisely (and surprisingly ... -
Very Interesting post Adam
Forgive my naive question/comment below- But I found your post so Interesting, especially since I had no idea of this sub-culture of extreme running. George Sheehan’s clip in particular was fascinating to me. But since I’m not a runner, I don’t have the s ... -
Hilary, You picked an
Hilary, You picked an excellent film clip to demonstrate your really great points about Cronenberg's depictions of the horrific yet pleasurable body. I love the way he shifts erogenous zones to different places on the body, and even detaches them int ... -
Thanks for the questions and further thoughts
I’ll have to keep thinking about an answer (you raise several good questions), but for now would say that I’m talking specifically about how the apocalyptic film (and any disaster film) ends. The upshot here is that almost all disaster films have an idiot ... -
Thinking further about this
Thank you Adam, you force me to consider something new. That is, the beautiful asthetic elements you mention- Wagner, the little stick hut, the holding of hands, etc., met with an unimaginable instantaneous full-out blast that destroys the earth. To me th ...